Constant pull vs. lockout
Q: I am in the market for a stringing machine and am having difficulty making sense of a couple of issues. One of them is constant-pull versus lockout. I have read on the web that lockout machines do not offer the consistency of constant pull machines because with the lockout machine (1) the string loses tension after you have tensioned it but before you have clamped it, and (2) the tension depends on how fast you move the crank. On the other hand, you may lose a little tension before clamping with an electric constant-pull machine if the tensioning system is not sensitive enough to compensate for small tension drops. Also, with constant-pull machines, there may be some inconsistency in tension if you are not consistent with the amount of time you let the string pull. The final issue is that of 360-degree rotation. Does lack of 360-degree rotation result in any lack of consistency in pulling the first two main strings or any other problem?
A: Unless you buy a really poor quality or malfunctioning machine, most of your problems with consistency are going to be due to your stringing technique, not the machine. That is to say, even though the final stringbed stiffness with a lockout machine is lower than that of a comparable constant-pull machine, this is not a consistency issue. As your technique improves with a lockout machine, your pulling speed and time-to-clamp will become more consistent.
Also, in most cases you will find there are larger consistency issues with the clamps and mounting system than with the tensioning system. Other than physical defect, the consistency of the tensioning system usually comes into play only if you don’t properly maintain and calibrate your lockout machine, as it typically will need re-calibration more often than a constant-pull machine.
In other words, for any reasonably competent stringing machine, the machine itself is almost certainly going to be more consistent than the stringer.
As for 360-degree rotation, again, this doesn’t affect consistency as much as it does speed. In fact, you stand to gain a bit of consistency by having the tension head up at the level of the stringbed. Whichever you choose, eventually that system will seem “normal” to you, and as your comfort grows with your machine, your consistency will improve.
See all articles by Greg Raven
RSI magazine search
RSI magazine articles
RSI magazine categories
- Ask the Experts
- Associations
- Awards
- Badminton
- Ball Machines
- Balls
- Business/Marketing
- Clothing
- Courts/Lighting
- Education
- Footwear
- Frames
- Grips
- Industry News
- Letters
- Media
- Miscellaneous
- Our Serve
- Peoplewatch
- Playtests
- Racquetball
- Reviews
- Science
- Squash
- Stringing
- Stringing Machines
- Strings
- Tennis
- Tips and Techniques
- Tournaments/Events
- Your Serve
RSI magazine archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- November 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004

