Floating knots
Q: I have been stringing for 20 years, and our facility strings more than 500 racquets a year. I thought I’d seen it all, but I have come across a very strange problem. One of your certification testers has instructed some of my stringers to use a knot that I have never seen before. He told them not to tie the knot around the main or cross string, but instead to float it in the grommet hole. He claims this is a new technique in stringing and prolongs grommet wear and increases tension accuracy. This sounds absurd to me but before I question his expertise I want to get your input.
A: The free-floating knot used to be optional for starting the cross strings, although at some point in the last 21 years it was dropped from our materials. It’s worth mentioning that there are many different knots for tying off tennis string, and some of the pro stringers even have “signature” knots that allow them to identify at a glance racquets they have strung. The bottom line is that although USRSA no longer teaches that knot, it does work.
If deciding on a starting knot seems more trouble than it’s worth, you can always clamp the starting tail of the string outside of the frame with a starting clamp, install the crosses as normal, and then come back and tie a “finishing” knot where you would otherwise tie a starting knot. To remove the starting clamp, you re-tension the starting tail, remove the starting clamp, and clamp off with the machine (or floating) clamp as you normally would.
See all articles by Greg Raven
RSI magazine search
RSI magazine articles
RSI magazine categories
- Ask the Experts
- Associations
- Awards
- Badminton
- Ball Machines
- Balls
- Business/Marketing
- Clothing
- Courts/Lighting
- Education
- Footwear
- Frames
- Grips
- Industry News
- Letters
- Media
- Miscellaneous
- Our Serve
- Peoplewatch
- Playtests
- Racquetball
- Reviews
- Science
- Squash
- Stringing
- Stringing Machines
- Strings
- Tennis
- Tips and Techniques
- Tournaments/Events
- Your Serve
RSI magazine archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- November 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004

