Raising the sweet spot
Q: I have noticed that my daughter hits the ball most of the time just above the sweet spot, and I was thinking of putting lead tape at the 2 and 10 o’clock positions of the head. Should I counterweight the butt end to keep the balance the same, or will that negate the raising of the sweet spot?
A: Adding mass in the upper part of the hoop may be just what your daughter needs to make her racquet perfect for her, but unless you add a huge amount of mass there, it won’t raise the sweet spot very much. It will change other characteristics of the racquet, though, which may give you the improvement you seek.
You don’t say what racquet your daughter uses, so we’ll use a Babolat Pure Storm Team for illustration. Strung with a poly/gut hybrid, and with an overgrip, it might have the following characteristics:
| Starting mass | 315 |
| Starting balance | 33.1 |
| Starting swingweight | 307 |
| Starting COP | 52.19 |
| Starting recoil weight | 139 |
| Starting hitting weight | 172 |
If you add 3 grams of lead tape about 6 centimeters down from the tip (around 2 and 10 o’clock), the racquet will have these characteristics:
| New mass | 318 |
| New balance | 33.38 |
| New swingweight | 315 |
| New COP | 52.4 |
| New recoil weight | 141 |
| New hitting weight | 175 |
You will note that the COP moved only about 2 millimeters, while the balance, swingweight, and hitting weight changed pretty dramatically. The higher swingweight will make it more difficult to accelerate and decelerate the racquet, but once it’s in motion, the higher hitting weight will give the racquet more power. The higher recoil weight should make the racquet more comfortable on impact.
If your daughter could cope with the higher weight and swingweight, but liked the original balance, you could restore it by adding 3.82 grams of lead tape at 10 centimeters up from the butt cap. The racquet would then have these characteristics:
| Final mass | 321.82 |
| Final balance | 33.1 |
| Final swingweight | 315 |
| Final COP | 52.4 |
| Final recoil weight | 144 |
| Final hitting weight | 175 |
With the additional mass in the handle, the original balance is restored, but the new higher swingweight, COP, and hitting weight are preserved. The yet-higher recoil weight once again should make the racquet more comfortable on impact. So, counter-balancing additional mass in the hoop with additional mass in the handle does not negate the gains from the additional mass in the hoop. Your actual figures depend, of course, on where you put the additional mass, and how much you add in which location(s).
USRSA members have access to several on-line tools and calculators to help model the effects of modifications such as these, including an all-new three-in-one version of the Racquet Customizer, and the Racquet Mass Mover. These and other tools and calculators can be found at http://www.usrsa.com/top/tools_toc.html.
RSI magazine search
RSI magazine articles
RSI magazine categories
- Ask the Experts
- Associations
- Awards
- Ball Machines
- Balls
- Business/Marketing
- Clothing
- Courts/Lighting
- Education
- Footwear
- Frames
- Grips
- Industry News
- Media
- Miscellaneous
- Our Serve
- Peoplewatch
- Playtests
- Racquetball
- Review
- Reviews
- Science
- Squash
- Stringing
- Stringing Machines
- Strings
- Tennis
- Tips and Techniques
- Tournaments/Events
- Your Serve
RSI magazine archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- November 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004

