'Tour' stringing
Q: I am trying to understand how to string a racquet according to what, in my mind, has been known as a “tour” type of a string job, such that the strings carry a uniform tightness from side to side and top to bottom. When stringing for myself and others, I was taught to tie mains off at the sides but this loses tension after tying the knot and releasing the clamp. I have played with racquets strung “tour” style and have found them noticeably different on court. Is there a written guide for this way of stringing?
A: Probably the most important aspect of tour stringers is their consistency: Two string jobs that are supposed to be the same, are the same. This is especially critical when a player is experimenting to see what tension is right for him or her. If the first racquet was supposed to be at 60 pounds, but came out closer to 62 pounds, and the next day the player asks for 62 pounds but the racquet is delivered at 58 pounds, chances are the player is not going to be able to zero in on his “perfect” tension for that tournament. Likewise, if on Monday the player requests and receives a racquet strung at 60 pounds, but on Tuesday requests 60 pounds and receives 57 pounds, he may be on the plane home from the tournament before he realizes what’s happening.
Beyond that, tournament stringers often increase the tension on the last string before tying off, to compensate for the small tension lost when tying off. (Here again, consistency comes into play in the way tour stringers tie off.) As you can see in the Stringer’s Digest, the USRSA recognizes this practice, but it usually is not necessary.
Tournament stringers also tend to string the crosses from the top down to the throat, on racquets where the crosses would normally be installed from the throat up. The Stringer’s Digest shows one way of accomplishing this with an “around-the-world” (ATW) technique, but typically tournament stringers use more exotic “box” techniques to enable them to string the crosses from top to bottom. “Box” stringing is more complex than the ATW technique, and there is no consensus on some of the fine points of various “box” patterns (which differ for every racquet configuration). Some tour stringers also strive to reduce the amount of string on the outside of the frame as part of the “box” technique, which some feel improves the playability of the racquet, along with the appearance. As we’ve mentioned before elsewhere, stringing an ATW or “box” pattern on some racquets will void the warranty, but players on the tour are generally more concerned with racquet playability than with frame longevity.


RSI magazine search
RSI magazine articles
RSI magazine categories
- Ask the Experts
- Associations
- Awards
- Ball Machines
- Balls
- Business/Marketing
- Clothing
- Courts/Lighting
- Education
- Footwear
- Frames
- Grips
- Industry News
- Media
- Miscellaneous
- Our Serve
- Peoplewatch
- Playtests
- Racquetball
- Review
- Reviews
- Science
- Squash
- Stringing
- Stringing Machines
- Strings
- Tennis
- Tips and Techniques
- Tournaments/Events
- Your Serve
RSI magazine archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- November 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004

